in our world of punditry | Dietmar Moews's Blog

Regierungs-Sondierungen in BERLIN ohne Perspektive

November 15, 2017

Lichtgeschwindigkeit 7727

Vom Mittwoch, 15. November 2017

Seit den Bundestagswahlen am 24. September 2017 haben die Fraktionsführungen der in den Bundestag eingezogenen deutschen Parteien, die CDU / CSU, die SPD, die LINKE, die AfD, FDP und GRÜNE, die Pflicht aus Staatsräson, auf Einladung des Bundespräsident Gespräche miteinander zu führen, Sondierungen durchzusprechen, ob es zu Koalitionszusammenschlüssen und zu einer KANZLERWAHL und REGIERUNGSKOALITION sowie Bundesminister für eine kommende Regierung, die eigentlich auf vier Jahre zusammenkommen sollte.

SONDIERUNGEN?

Die Fraktionen haben ein langes Jahr in Wahlkämpfen auf Länderebenen sowie zuletzt für die Bundestagswahl miteinander gekämpft und gestritten und sich kritisch mit den Ideen der gegnerischen Parteien auseinandergesetzt. Damit heißt „Sondieren“ nicht, zu erfahren, was die anderen wollen und proklamieren – denn das ist hinlänglich allen bekannt.

SONDIERUNGEN sollen ausloten, welche der kontroversen Parteiprogramme einfach ausgesetzt und zurückgeschoben werden können. Worauf keine Kompromissvereinbarung ausgehandelt werden kann, wenn z. B. LIBERALE deregulieren wollen, aber die C-Parteien Vorrechte für INTERESSEN regulieren wollen (möglicherweise, weil beide, FDP und CDU, von konkurrierenden Wirtschaftszweigen „lobbyiert werden und im Wort sind).

Wenn die GRÜNEN „grüne Politikziele verfolgen, aber die CSU DIESEL-KRIMINALITÄT weiterhin dulden wollen. Wenn die CDU ISRAEL und SAUDI-Arabien Waffen liefert, gegen IRAN, während die GRÜNEN die geltende Verfassung einklagen, die da lautet „keine Rüstungslieferungen in heiße Kriegsgebiete“.

Dietmar Moews meint: Das Gerede der SONDIERUNGEN eine üble Spielart der Ablenkung und Überdruss zu erzeugen, damit die kritischen Blicke auf die kommenden Machenschaften verschwimmen.

Alle Parteien und Fraktionen sondieren also konkrete Politikfelder und „rote Linien“ usw. in Wahrheit versuchen sie, die eigene Lage für kommende Wahlen vorzubereiten.

Die CSU redet von Flüchtlingszahlen (obwohl damit für die Deutschen momentan keinerlei Probeme verbunden sind – kämen jetzt zu einer Fußballweltmeisterschaft 1 Million Familien nach Deutschland, würde man sich über die weltweite Reisebeliebtheit und Tourismus-Devisen freuen. Aber bei einem Familienachzug von 200.000 Leuten „brennt angeblich er Hut“ – denn das brächte der AfD weitere Wähler ein).

Kurz, die CSU hat überhaupt keine Idee, wie sie im Herbst 2018 eine absolute Mehrheit bei der Bayerischen Staatswahl erringen könnte, nachdem sie so große Wählergruppen nach rechts und links verloren hat. Aber jetzt haben wir SONDIERUNGEN als CSU-Theater, weil die CSU die kommende Landtagswahl fürchtet.

Die FDP sondiert dem Schein nach, denn sie weiß Alles über die anderen Fraktionen lückenlos – aber deshalb erklären die FDP-Akteure in Berlin täglich, „wir haben keine Angst vor Neuwahlen!“ – falls „Jamaika schietert.

Tatsächlich ist die FDP eine vollkommen überflüssige Nischen-Agentur mit der Mimikry einer politischen Partei von Großkapital und „Freien Berufen“.

Die GRÜNEN wurden gegründet, um einen ökologischen Wandel zu initiieren. Eklatante INTERESSEN durch die die Welt geplündert und auf ewig zerstört wird, sollen gestoppt werden. Doch GRÜNE POLITIK werden die anderen Blockparteien nicht zulassen – egal was man noch sondiert.

Es wird in dieser Viererkoalition keine GRÜNE POLITIK geben, keine GRÜNEN MNISTER, sondern eitle Ehrgeizler, wie Kretschmann oder Özdemir, die Staatsmännisch herumfummeln, aber keine ALTERNATIVE POLITIK zum Raubtierkapitalismus bringen werden. Also, was soll das?

Die GRÜNEN machen FUKUSHIMA, machen Krieg, Rüstungsexport, Nato-Kolonialismus, INTERESSEN des internationalen Groß-Finanz-Kasinos – alles ÜBEL, die mal alternative Kräfte der GRÜNEN sein sollten. Was machen die GRÜNEN jetzt? Nitrat im Niedersächsischen Erdboden, Glyphosat zum Abwinken, FRACKING-Lizenzen als „Forschungsprojekte“, CO2 aus Autos, Kraftwerken, Rindern und Allem, was nicht stinkt.

SONDIERUNGEN zeigen, dass die deutschen Wähler keinerlei „absolute Mehrheit“ verkörpern. Aber die Interpretation des Wahlergebnisses, „die Große Koalition sei abgewählt worden“ ist unzutreffend. denn die größte numerische Zustimmung der Deutschen ist die einfache Addition von CDU/CSU und SPD, also die Fortsetzung der Blockparteien-Politik zur Unterwerfung unter die USA:

Alles andere, ob Links oder Rechts ist nicht mehrheitsfähig. Und GRÜNE Politik interessiert aktuell nur noch knapp 10 Prozent der Besservedienenden.

Angela Merkel sollte als Minderheiten-Kanzlerin kandidieren und dann für einen Personalwechsel in der SPD einleiten, sodass MERKEL mit SIGMAR GABRIEL und BARBARA HENDRICKS eine erneute Blockparteienregierung bilden könnte.

FINE E COMPATTOi

WARNUNG: recommended posts (Zusätze, die als Empfehlungen oder Beziehungen von WordPress hier eingestellt werden)

auf dem Dietmar Moews‘ Blog eingeblendete „Recommended Posts“ oder sonstige „Pseudoempfehlungen“ werden von WordPress

gegen das Einverständnis des Eigentümers Dr. Dietmar Moews

hier gezeigt und sind keine Empfehlungen von Dr. Dietmar Moews. Nichts davon wird i.S.d.P. von Dr. Dietmar Moews verantwortet. Dietmar Moews klickt diese „recommendends“ nicht an und liest nichts davon.

Ab jetzt werden alle Dietmar Moews‘ Blog-Beiträge mit dem SLOGAN

FINE E COMPATTO deutlich beendet.

WARNUNG: recommended posts

und BESTELLEN

subscription to Dietmar Moews Abonnement von Dietmar Moews un abonnement à Dietmar Moews

Blätter für Kunst und Kultur erscheinen in loser Folge im Verlag Pandora-Kunst-Projekt Köln

Blätter Neue Sinnlichkeit

Indem ich Ihnen ein langes Leben wünsche, sparen Sie auf diese Weise ganz erheblich.

Abonnement auf Lebenszeit für EURO 500,- (oder entsprechender Landeswährung)

Einzelpreis oder Abonnement inkl. Versand EURO 12.-, Schüler bei Selbstabholung EURO 4.-

Abonnieren Sie mit Namen, Postanschrift, Ort, Datum, Unterschrift sowie EURO 500 zur Verrechnung bei:

PANDORA KUNST PROJEKT

zu Händen Dr. Dietmar Moews

Mainzer Straße 28

D-50678 Köln am Rhein

Leave a Comment » | Uncategorized | Verschlagwortet: 'Black Hawk'-Helikopter, (Hagana, .Waffen US-Amerikanisch, 000 bill lying on the ground waiting for someone to pick it up. Eventually, 1964, 25 Milliarden US-Dollar, a political discussion, a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, a Times columnist, abandon discredited ideas and better serve the common good. For Henry this would mean transforming Trump’s campaign-trail economic populism into a conservative agenda genuinely geared toward the mid, actually, Al Qaida aktiv (sunnitisch), Alberta, although they may be loyal to the ghost of one simply by force of inertia. They’re keeping up a degree of surface continuity, always talks about the striver, amerikanische "Black Hawk"-Hubschrauber, and a lack of policy-specific work in a host of specific areas, and a place where someone like Cotton has separated himself from those would-be reforming Republicans who still back the Bush-era elite-Republican consensus. But at the same time the Rubio-Ivanka part, and among the public. Once Trump no longer personally bestrides the Republican scene, and Barack Obama was elected as a foreign-policy reformist. But their softer, and claim the mantle away from the island-of-misfit-toys figures who attached themselves to Trump’s campaign. But Reagan, and Daniel McCarthy, and fear is by far the largest. Once pols start taking the leap, and I do think the problems in the West run deep enough that Trumpism’s association with Trump, and is it possible to imagine a new infrastructure that would champion populist and nationalist ideas within the party and make them something more than just angry anti-elitist gestures? Ross Douthat, and it doesn’t take much or very long for someone to break through. Douthat: Yes, and much sooner than most pundits think. McCarthy: Your point about Capitol Hill is well taken, and neither is Tom Cotton, and not imagine the world will play to your plans. Douthat: Well, and one who doesn’t like or really “get” the Republican Party to begin with. So he has been very ineffective inside or outside at promoting a positive agenda that can work within the existing G., and see they get cheers from voters, and so on, and that if you don’t have people standing by and ready to implement an agenda, and that’s strangely part of what Trump’s campaign delivered. But I am much more skeptical than you, and the next phase of the Trump insurgency, and then he (presumably) will run for re-election. As long as he’s bestriding the Republican world, and triangulation always disappoints. McCarthy: I agree with Henry. Haley is not someone I’m fond of, and Trump’s nomination is proof of that. I think it will take a big defeat, and you can’t create a revolution of the heart and the mind simply by adding a couple of tweaks here and there. That’s triangulation, and you’re plugged into them, are any Trumpist or populist ideas gaining traction within the G.O.P. but outside the White House? It seems to me that many of the ideas for a more middle-class agenda that you and I share already hav, are the major things holding back the next iteration of conservatism, Argentinien, Arizona, Arkansas, Armenien, Arsenal, Artilleriegeschütze, as it did with Reagan, as opposed to populist gestures. Olsen: I regretfully agree that no one who seems sympathetic to populism is willing to blow up the tax bill, as some of my realist friends in the academy sometimes seem to believe, Aserbeitschan, at least on trade. So he was always going to have a terrible time on that unless Trump was willing to tell aides who don’t agree with him to just do something specific that Trump probably doesn’t , at some point a new synthesis needs a bold politician or politicians to actually champion it, at the presidential level, Aufrüstung der irakischen Armee, Australien, “Let’s cut payroll taxes, ” ditching libertarianism and even doing outreach to minority voters with economic-nationalist themes. But then when it comes to the specifics of his strategy, Ägypten, Bangladesh, Bannon always seems more inclined toward seeking out racialized cultural fights, Bannon will continue to be suspected of simply peddling racialized populism. McCarthy: If I can add to Henry’s point, Barack Obama, Bürgerkrieg, because Republican officeholders are so timorous. But I am not at all convinced that having Trump be the president is helpful to the process of finding Trumpism’s Reagan (unless it turns out to the , before 2016, before lower levels of politics had been changed or any outside institutional support structure was in place. But you have to take what you get, before mainstream Republican pols start to realize the old ways aren’t politically sustainable. Just the sort of defeat that an inept reaction to last week’s election thrashing would create — an, Belgien, Bin Ladin aus der saudi-arabischen Nomenklatura, both by associating them with darker tendencies (realism with xenophobia, boy, Brasilien, Bulgarien, business-G.O.P. choices or a hybrid of the two (almost everyone else). Immigration policy is the one exception, but beyond them nobody obvious at all. Olsen: True, but he did that during the campaign, but he’s accelerated it. As yet, but I find the foreign-policy views there less penetrating than the rest of the journal. Douthat: And Henry, but I’m not. The fundamental thing that Trump has done is to break up old expectations and points of view. There are questions being asked about foreign policy — in the White House, but in one sense the fact that Trump has really abandoned populist domestic policy helps to insulate that against his implosion. Someone who tackles trade in the way it should be, but it takes only one to start something. Fear, but it’s radically different from the politics we’re used to. It’s a new hybrid: a media-political entity. Democrats thought that Ronald Reagan was such a thing, but it’s where deep change has to start. Douthat: O.K. — but then who follows it through? Trump is president, but mostly just to Trump’s generals. So we’ve ended up with a foreign policy in which the generals are the custodians of the foreign policy status quo, but not in the mind of Republican elites. I sometimes liked to say, but not on foreign policy. Which was what made Trump so distinctive: He combined ideas that go together in the minds of many voters, but she would be very well positioned to take up that mantle if she were to leave the United Nations after 2018 and become more of an “all purpose” political figure. We also need more pundits to s, but that’s also the area where Trump’s ideas already overlapped with a significant Republican faction’s approach. I often imagine that Trump has these instincts and no one around him with knowle, but the fact is pure Trumpism is D.O.A. on that score, but the foundations of our policy have been called into question. You’re right that that’s not enough, but the point is to change it. So at the risk of trying too hard to pin you guys down: Is there any right-of-center political figure, but then, but they might not have to: They might be correctly figuring that Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, but they rarely if ever get into industrial policy. Whereas the populists I’m more sympathetic to in foreign policy, but they’ve both acclimated themselves to the Trump era very effectively. I hope Republican realists can adapt as well. That will require them to be a bit more right-wing or populist in their mass a, but this time it’s come true. As for the generals, but ultimately you can’t think you’ll curry favor with everyone and offend no one — that’s an anti-political ideal. Douthat: Yes, but who nonetheless seem to be pre-Trump figures — I have in mind Mike Lee and Rand Paul in particular. Whether they become more or less salient post-Trump is something I’m interested to see. My g, California, Can Trumpism Survive Trump? By ROSS DOUTHAT, Canada, champion a different kind of foreign policy — more restrained or at least less fixated on “exporting democracy” — in recent years. Two Republicans named Paul (Ron and Rand) advanced ideas in t, christliche, Dan, Dan (and this goes for you too, Dan — taking the less interventionist line on a range of issues, Dan) and maybe even Ivanka Trump, Dan? Is it happening in think tanks and other institutions? Among the people Trump has appointed (to the extent he has appointed them) to staff the State Department and Defense Departments? It seemed , DANIEL McCARTHY and HENRY OLSEN Can Trumpist ideas, Dänemark, depending on her ambitions, Der WESTEN schafft sich ab, despite my skepticism that electing Trump was an effective way of reaching them. So my first question to you both is how you see those “Trumpist” ideas — the good ones, Deutschland, Dietmarmoews, do seem interested in trade and industry. Even “libertarian populists” like Ron Paul, Dominikanische Republik, Dr. Dietmar Moews, Dschihadisten, encouraging fair trade and providing real adjustment support for workers subject to global pressures, England, Erdogan, Eroberungszug, Estland, europäische Union, even a Democratic president, even if he’s seen as catastrophic, even or especially among the people who might otherwise be interested in taking them up, Falschinformation", Fatah (sunnitisch), favoring tariffs. Douthat: Those are both fair points. I agree that Trump went much further than Rubio or any broader “reform conservatism” in questioning the foundations of economic policy. And c, Färöer, figures like Cotton and Rubio are wary of going too far with it, finanzstärkste Terrorgruppe der Welt, Finnland, Florida, for a brief time, for another three years, for example, for good or ill. Douthat: But Bannon was, Foto eines Helikopter, Frankreich, Freiräume, from Syria to Afghanistan to maybe North Korea. And he lost most of those battles, from your more pessimistic perspective, Geld und Solidarität, georgien, gepanzerte Geländewagen, gepanzerte Truppentransporter aus US-Produktion, Granaten, Grönland, Griechenland, Haiti, Hamas (sunnitisch), Haubitzen vom Typ M198, he does... Douthat: I agree that he’s raised those questions, heidnische Exklusivansprüche, Henry, Heyl mishmar, Hillary Clinton, Hisbollah (schiitisch), however, Hubschrauber, Humvee-Geländewagen, I agree: Even now, I don’t really agree that Rubio, I don’t think we should be looking for a single figure, I find much more questioning about the purposes and instruments of United States foreign policy than I did before. Not all of that is because of Trump, I mean — faring so far under this presidency? Is there any sign that Trump’s administration has been effective at advancing them? Is it possible to pursue an ideological revolution when your admin, I should emphasize I don’t mean that Bannonism is “fake politics.” It’s real, I think, I thought that if Trump had lost, I’ll close out by imagining a world where Steve Bannon manages to recruit one of you two for a Senate primary campaign — and by thanking you both for a stimulating conversation., Idaho, if you had asked that question about conservatism generally on Oct. 26, Illinois, in Congress, in domestic and foreign policy, in having the kind of conversation you envision? I share a lot of your views, in his way. When it comes to blurring the line, in our world of punditry, in prime time on Fox. The conversation is becoming a public one in a way that it had not been before: It was very narrowly restricted to a few thinkers ahead of the curve. Douthat: Fair enough! Still, in the classic case, in the media and in the think-tank world — that need to be asked but had been ignored too long. Starting with what the purpose of our foreign-policy should be: national interest — “America First, in the media as well as in Congress, in the... Montreal Moe The scathing attack on our Prime Minister by the Philippine tyrant is one of the obstacles men like Mr Trump pose to western democracy. The... Elizabeth Ross Dothan once again p, including foreign policy, including Trump and Bannon and, Indien, Indonesien, inside the system, interestingly enough, international, Irak und in Syrien (Isis) mehrere Stützpunkte der Armee, Iran, Irgun Tzwa'i Le'umi, Irland, is close to Trump on domestic policy. And I think there are different senses of populist and distinctly different ideas of what a middle-class economic policy looks like. I’ve found it telling, is it Trump the realist who falls or Trump the “Jacksonian” hawk? But more important, Isis, Islamischer Staat, Islamismus der Gläubigen, islamistische Extremisten, Island, isn’t really engaging Trump. Anyone who says, it doesn’t matter what you campaigned on — you’ll get bog-standard pre-Trump Republicanism, it happened right at the top, it predated trump in the Republican Party, it seems that no G.O.P. politician is going to emerge as a clear champion of the next Republicanism, it sure looks like the first reaction might be exactly that! Douthat: And yet in Steve Bannon, Italien, Japan, jüdische, John McCain or Bob Corker will do it for them first. Douthat: But then on foreign policy, just as an on-the-decline actor was reading Human Events and National Review back in the 1950s but had enough common sense to see how it could be blended with something else to really take off. Our ti, Kanada, Kansas, Konfliktregionen, konkrete Ansage, Korea, Kroatien, lebendige Kulturgeschichte, let alone systematic answers. American Affairs has broached them, Lettland, Lichtgeschwindigkeit, like most Republicans, Litauen, Louisiana, Luxemburg, Malta, Massachusetts, Mexico, Mexiko, Mianmar, Militär in Bagdad, militärische Zersetzung, modernde Verpitbullung, modernes Kriegsgerät, Montana, more cerebral approaches didn’t shake up the way Washington thinks about the world nearly as much as Donald Trump has done. The “shambolic” quality of Trump is precisely what is opening up these, my realist friends are dismayed by what they’ve seen so far, NeueSinnlichkeit, Nicaragua, Niederlande, Nordirak, Norwegen, not because it was worthy in and of itself. That’s just not the way to think about economic populism, not corporate taxes” is plowing new ground. And so on. Immigration restriction would be a policy that is tainted by Trump failure, not less, not the last of which is that trade helps many workers, not to the ideological neoconservative types, Notmanagement, now on the American scene, of course, of getting too far away from Reaganite orthodoxy. Neither of them are likely to (for instance) blow up the tax bill because it isn’t friendly enough to the middle class, Ohio, one answer this administration has supplied is that personnel is policy, or at least within his White House, or he’ll let them go whole Tea Party, or his own promise of a trillion-dollar infrastructure bill. Olsen: Bannon’s economic populism really consists of two things: restrict trade and restrict immigration. That’s got loads of problems, or linking himself to substance-free resentment vehicles like Roy Moore, or the populist insurgency, or they’ll just attack Mitch McConnell and “the establishment” on a contentless, Palmach (Untergrund-Milizen in Israel), Panzer, Pat Buchanan, patriarchalisch. Nationalismus, Pentagonsprecher Bill Speaks, personal campaign. None of those approaches will build real support for a workers’ party. A serious attempt to do that requires a language of citizenship rather than resentment and a policy agenda b, PLO (palästinensisch), Polen, politicians may be helpless before it, politics should carry precisely these risks. It’s not that you want to be indifferent to your associations, politische Wirkkräfte, populism with racism) and by associating them with simple incompetence. Olsen: Yes, populist and nationalist, Präsidentschaftswahl, precisely because Trumpism is so inchoate. If Trump falls, promising to carry the cause forward, pundits were certain that conservatism (Goldwater-style) was permanently discredited. The joke was on them. Olsen: Well, ranging from Cotton to Marco Rubio to Mike Lee and others. Olsen: Sympathy for some aspects, rückständige Ethnien, Rüstung, really since the Tea Party wave ebbed. What’s been missing is a sense among Republican politicians that these proposals — even something with as much support as a larger child-tax credit — shoul, recently hosted a discussion of these questions with Henry Olsen, Regierungs-Sondierungen in BERLIN ohne Perspektive, religiöse Wertkollektive, Religion, right? McCarthy: You’re right that Bannon is serious about policy, Ross, Ross. But you never before had someone expressing the views that, Russland, Sadam Hussein (Bath-Partei), Saskatchewan, Saudi-Arabien, say, Südafrika, Südkorea, Schiiten Al-Maliki, Schokaoladentester, Schottland, Schweden, Schweiz, Scott Walker or John Kasich — been willing to explore these themes, seems to have value for him because it led to his being able to go to college, Sibirien, since it seems to me to be trapping the Republican politicians who should be arguing and experimenting on all these fronts. And I also feel that we’ve all been having these conversations, since the crackup of the Bush administration 10 years ago now, Slowakei, Slowenien, so he gets options that don’t come close to matching what he campaigned on. McCarthy: We’ve seen other candidates, so it’s not too surprising to me that he remains distinctly orthodox in what he’s willing to do. Douthat: Yes, someone will. I think Cotton is farthest along in pursuing it. Nikki Haley is more hawkish than Dan will like, Spanien, stets muslimische, such as my old American Conservative colleague Michael Brendan Dougherty. Among congressmen and think-tank types that I talk to in D.C., sunnitische Bürgerkriegs-Kalifats-Organisation, survive the polarizing and thus-far stumbling presidency of Donald Trump? What is Trumpism after Trump, Susan Collins of Maine, Syrien (unter und gegen Assad), Taiwan, Taliban aus Pakistan (sunnitisch), talk a lot about tax-code tweaks and measures that might be intended to foster a “pro-family” welfare state, Türkei, Teil ihrer Beute, tend to make hay about the iniquities of Nafta while not, Terrorgruppe, Texas, Thailand, than the Republican norm. They’re closer to Trumpism or Bannonism or whatever on domestic policy, than toward pursuing the economic-policy shift he’s officially in favor of accomplishing. What do you think of the frequent liberal argument that this is a problem inherent to right-wing populism �, thanks for joining me today. You are both prominent champions of the view that Donald Trump’s election represents a chance for the Republican Party to reinvent itself, that can be smoothly applied to create a new foreign policy. There has to be political give and take — ”political” in the broad sense, that for a long time had been the domain of a narrow range of expert opinion. When it comes to who follows through, that if Trump is perceived as a crashing failure — or for that matter if he’s somehow ejected from office — that the ideas that you think he’s tacitly championed will be seen as inherently tai, that the “other side” from me, that the effort to build a pan-ethnic conservative populism is foredoomed? Olsen: We have to remember that Bannon is really a political newbie, that the G.O.P. needed a synthesis of Rubio and Rand Paul, that this synthesis has gained ground since. McCarthy: Ross, that was committed to an Obama-ism defined in part by its resistance to hawkishness and interventionism. Is such a faction coming into being on the right outside the realist and paleocon periodicals? , that’s still true — but does it have to be? Olsen: The G.O.P. remains intellectually wedded to dying dogma. The congressional party really wants to do nothing other than cut taxes for businesspeop, that’s why Bannon is unleashing primary attacks against Republican incumbents. We still have a Bush-Republican Congress, the editor of Modern Age and an editor at large of The American Conservative. Ross Douthat: Henry, the fact is that most of these proto-populists (with the exception of Lee) are also more hawkish, the line between right-wing media and politics has blurred to the point where we can’t tell if Bannon is a media figure aiming for ratings and clicks or a political figure aiming for policy and elec, the numbers will start to swell. The fact is there are very few Republican voters who really care about the issues the party’s donors and the Wall Street Journal editorial board are pushing. Had any, the person who wants to get ahead. His dad’s stint as a bartender, the way Ted Cruz blew up various deals to build his brand. They’re not sure there’s enough support there for strong populism, the way Trump himself sort of did. We journalists have described the world of conservatism, there is that risk, there will be a whole host of squirming and wriggling new mutations evolving their way out of the new environment — I just couldn’t guess what’ll they look like when they’ve all grown up. Dout, there would have been room for someone smart to step up and play Reagan to his Goldwater — to give a big speech embracing some of his themes, there’s no single institution that really embodies the new questions, they would have pre-empted Trump and the rest of the field. There is a large market for a conservative-populist party, they’re not advancing a grand ideological program in foreign policy, they’ve been too wonkish and above-the-fray. Douthat: My sense of things is that on the domestic front, though, throughout our institutions. There’s no blueprint, to advance Trumpism. And while he was there he didn’t do much to advance Henry’s economic-populist vision, to shake free of ideological sclerosis, to that process, too. And it takes the business-conservative faction inside the G.O.P. head on without sufficient support from the broader Tea Party wing, too. Conservatism itself needs to be redefined, too. Immigration restriction will become law only as part of a larger deal that is much more like what Tom Cotton proposes than what Ann Coulter promotes. McCarthy: In part I’m not worried about wha, too. In some sense people assume that campaigns pose questions and that administrations supply answers. And at the very least, Totalitarismen, traditionelle angestammte ethnische, trying to actually be a political figure, trying to work inside the White House, Tschechei, Tucker Carlson now routinely does, Turkmenschen aus Tschetschenien (sunnitisch), TWITTER, Ukraine, Ungarn, Unheil der ISIS, Unklarheit, US-Regierung, USA, Usbekistan, Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, vereinigtes Königreich, verselbständigte Kurden, vielseitige Bürgerkriegsparteien, Vietnam, Virginia, Volksrepublik China, vom CIA ausgebildet, Waffen, Wales, was not an officeholder at the point when he gave his speech. So perhaps it would have needed to be someone out of politics, Washington D. C., we assume, we should be looking rather for a national discussion, Weißrussland, whatever it might be. Or maybe that’s wrong. But it seems to me that he has only a few figures right now who are even would-be heirs — Tom Cotton certainly (whose foreign policy views I suspect yo, whatever rhetorical gloss you put on it. Olsen: That’s certainly true for the economic policy agenda. No one tasked with administering policy in any of those areas is supportive of a new approach. S, when it comes to the intellectual bankruptcy and persistent failure of the Western elite. But I also don’t underestimate that elite’s capacity to retain a hold on power when their critics are self, which is exactly what Reagan tried to create during his lifetime. McCarthy: What Trump has done is to re-politicize basic questions of policy, which means they will campaign only on immigration and Muslim terrorism, who gives you hope for the G.O.P. after Trump? (I’ll offer my own non-answer after yours.) McCarthy: There are plenty of Republicans who are smart and principled and in some respects forward-thinkin, who tend to be aligned with neoconservatives in foreign policy, will be to storm the House and Senate. I’ve said in other venues that in some ways the “revolution” was premature, will not prevent these ideas from returning to the surface in some form. McCarthy: We can also look at past examples: When Barry Goldwater was blown out in 1964, with the average person as your touchstone. Rubio, without having anyone except Trump really taking up the ideas that they imply. McCarthy: The world of punditry has been having the conversation at some levels, yes. But the populist mind-set starts, you have a lot of different Republican figures who have sympathy for a genuinely populist agenda, you have someone with real prominence who keeps saying that the party needs to change in something like the direction that you advocate — who talks about building a “workers’ party, you would have had to say no. But then Reagan gave his “A Time for Choosing” speech on Oct. 27. American politics is very fluid and open, Zypern | Permalink
Veröffentlicht von dietmarmoews

Schoki-Test mit Rapunzel Studentenfutter Vollmilchschokolade mit Nüssen und Trockenfrüchten 34% Kakao

November 14, 2017

Lichtgeschwindigkeit 7726

Vom Mittwoch, 15. November 2017

Dietmar Moews meint:

„Bozik, immer wieder Bozik

der rechte Läufer der Ungarn, am Ball.

Er hat den Ball …

verloren diesmal gegen Schäfer.

Schäfer nach innen geflankt – Kopfball –

abgewehrt –

aus dem Hintergrund müsste Rahn schießen –

Rahn schießt ..

Tooor! Tooor! Tooor! Tooor!

Tor für Deutschland!

Linksschuss von Rahn

3:2 für Deutschland fünf Minuten vor dem Ende.„

(Herbert Zimmermann 1917-1966; „Fußball-WM-Endspiel-Übertragung vom Radio-Lifekommentar des Saarländischen Rundfunks, am 4. Juli 1954 aus Bern)

Ich probierte eine deutsch-italienische Schokolade, RAPUNZEL Studentenfutter Vollmilchschokolade mit Nüssen und Trockenfrüchten 34 Prozent Kakao. Sie wird für RAPUNZEL Naturkost in 87764 Legau, Deutschland, in Italien, ohne Angabe des Herstellers und des Herstellungsorts, produziert.

Kurz vorab: Diese Vollmilch-Schokolade mit Nüssen, Cashewkernen, Mandeln, Trockenfrüchten und dem biologischen Etikett mundet sehr gut. Sie ist eine überdurchschnittliche Industrie-Massenware, kann allerdings durch das Hand in Hand-Prinzip durchaus als BEAN to BAR angesprochen werden. Hauptbestandteil ist ZUCKER. Reißt man die Packung auf, kommt ein Nougat-Geruch entgegen. Die fast quadratische 100 Gramm-Tafel kauft man in einem „Bio-“ oder „Naturkost“-LADEN oder Reformhaus in Köln. Das ist exklusiv, kein Discounter. Aber diese gute Qualität für ist 2 Euro 19 Online) nicht zu teuer.
.

Rapunzel schreibt: „…Die Geschichte beginnt 1.500 v. Chr. bei den Olmeken. Seit RAPUNZEL die weltweit erste Schokolade aus kontrolliert biologischen Zutaten produzierte ist ein vielfältiges Sortiment entstanden. RAPUNZEL Schokolade steht für beste Qualität verbunden mit wertvollen, fair gehandelten Zutaten aus kontrolliert biologischem Anbau.

Den Kakao beziehen wir von Kakaobauernkooperativen aus der Dominikanischen Republik- unserem Hand in Hand-Partner. Die Kakaobäume sind hier nicht als Monokultur gepflanzt, sondern eingebettet in die natürliche urwaldähnliche Umgebung unter großen Schattenbäumen.“

Der RAPADURA Vollrohrzucker und Cristallino Rohrzucker stammen ebenfalls aus fairem Handel und runden das Aroma der Schokolade durch ihre angenehme karamellige Note fein ab.

Für mich als Schokoladen-Liebhaber ist eine Schokolade, die nicht zu hell, aber nicht ganz dunkel ist und Milch-Schokolade heißt, das Schönste von der Welt. Diese Vollmilch-Nuß-Trockenfrüchte-Mischung entspricht meiner persönlichen Vorliebe – wobei es nicht auf die höchste Qualitätsspitze ankommt, wenn die Komposition stimmt wie hier RAPUNZEL. Sie ist allerdings zu stark gezuckert, sie ist zu fett und enthält Fettzusätze, die wirklich nicht zur Schokolade gehören. Sie ist aber nicht talgig, sie enthält als Emulgator Sojalecithin, angeblich nicht genmanipuliert. Die Trockenfrüchte-Beimischungen haben Qualität, sind knackig, frisch, überhaupt nicht ranzig oder zu stark geröstet. Die Blend-Kakaomischung dieser fairen 100 g Packung wirkt nicht wirklich frisch und datiert (mindestens bis 15.12. 2018 haltbar). Diese Datierung ist nicht besonders fair. Der Kunde kann nicht sehen, wann diese RAPUNZEL gemacht wurde. Das gefällt nicht.

Die sinnliche Qualität und Wahrnehmung ist solide. Viel Zucker, sehr viel Fett, Blend-Kakao, Schokolade, man schmeckt die VOLLMILCH und den KAKAO, dazu diese Nüsse und Trockenfrüchte.

Die 100 gr. Tafelpackung enthält die mittelbraune Süßstofftafel mit einem Bruchkanten-Relief oben, mit den klassisch-rechteckigen Bruchkanten. Die Unterseite ist ganz rauh, mit den herausragenden Haselnüssen. Die Konsistenz und der Schmelz sind befriedigend. Man beißt ab. Das Knacken ist nicht bedeutend. So ein Abbiss löst sich zwar leicht auf, die Kaumasse ist ein etwas schleimendes Gemisch. Insgesamt ist es aber keine Billigqualität, man schmeckt Aroma, natürliches Vanille. Cacaobutter und Vollmilchpulver. Die Bezeichnung natürliches Aroma ist in Verbindung mit allen Angaben von RAPUNZEL, zur Bio und Fair Trade Tradition auf der Packung, vertrauenserweckend, da heißt es auch innen, auf der weißen Innenseite der Hülle:

„Seit RAPUNZEL die weltweit erste Schokolade aus kontrolliert biologischen Zutaten produzierte ist ein vielfältiges Sortiment entstanden. RAPUNZEL Schokolade steht für beste Qualität verbunden mit wertvollen, fair gehandelten Zutaten aus kontrolliert biologischem Anbau.

Der RAPADURA Vollrohrzucker und Cristallino Rohrzucker stammen ebenfalls aus fairem Handel und runden das Aroma der Schokolade durch ihre angenehme karamellige Note fein ab.

Durch das intensive Conchieren entwickelt sich der anfänglich noch verborgene Reichtum an kakaoeigenen Aromen Stufe um Stufe, bis zur vollen Entfaltung. Gleichzeitig wird vollkommene Feinheit und der unvergleichlich zarte Schmelz erreicht….“

Die etwas folkloristische Packung ist aus plastikartigem Umschlagpapier in Grün, mit dekorativen bunte Vignetten sowie weiße Blockschrift, groß Mandeln, Cashew, Haselnuss sowie das Hand in Hand Lable, dazu ein Abbruchstück, etwas über lebensgroß, und zwei Krachnüsse als Photo-Repro abgebildet. Da drunter in feinen Versalien der Helvetica VOLLMILCHSCHOKOLADE MIT NÜSSEN UND TROCKENFRÜCHTEN. „Wir machen Bio aus Liebe.“ Innen hat sie das beliebte feine Silberpapier nicht.

Auf der Rückseite wird Deutsch, Französisch, Niederländisch, Italienisch, Spanisch und Englisch in unlesbarer Kleinstschrift aufgelistet:

Nährwertangaben pro 100 g (durchschnittlich)

Brennwert 2.308 kj / 555 kcal

Fett 39 g

davon gesättigte Fettsäuren 17 g

Kohlenhydrate 38 g

davon Zucker 34 g

Eiweiß 10 g

Salz 0,02 g

Die Aufmachung hat bei dieser Sorte einer 100 Gramm Tafelschokolade von RAPUNZEL. Sie kommt mit mehreren Werbesymbolen: Sowas wie Fairer Handel, ökologischer Anbau – wirkt aber lediglich angetäuscht, wenn es einfach heißt BIO – denn was ist nicht BIO.

EMPFEHLUNG: Der Tester empfiehlt diese süße Misch-Schokolade gerne – sie wirkt fair, ist mit 2 Euro 19 nicht zu kostspielig und würde ihr ZWEI von SECHS Kakaobohnen geben – Georg Bernardini hat sie nicht getestet.

FINE E COMPATTO