Lichtgeschwindigkeit 7633
am Montag, 2. Oktober 2017
.
.
In diesen Tagen hat die britische Regierungschefin (Premier Minister) THERESA MAY, KONSERVATIVE PARTEI, einen TORIE-Kongress anberaumt:
.
Die Tories und May hatten die Wahlen gewonnen, wo es sehr zugespitzt darum ging, dass Theresa May die BREXIT-Volksabstimmung abgefragt hat, entweder BREXIT-Zustimmung oder EU-REMAIN.
.
Die erstaunliche Mehrheit hat Theresa Mays BREXIT-Dynamik unterstützt (während May ursprünglich persönlich gegen einen EU-Austritt stand).
.
Doch inzwischen zeichnen sich EU-Austritts-Kosten und bis dahin verkannte Nachteile für Großbritannien eindeutig ab:
.
.
EINS: BREXIT kostet viel Geld und wirtschafts- und handelspolitische Nachteile für Großbritannien
.
ZWEI: Die sozialen Kosten und Veränderungszwänge der inzwischen gewohnten barrierefreien Lebensverkehre betreffen fast alle Briten, nicht nur Gastarbeiter oder Immigrants.
.
DREI: Die lautstarke britische Forderung nach „hartem EXIT“, wird inzwischen von den EU-Verhandlern angenommen. Dabei entsteht geradezu eine isolationistische Katastrophe für die Briten, auch untereinander, Schottland, Wales, Irland/Nordirland, England.
.
VIER: NATO-Mitgliedschaft ohne EU-Hintergrund strapaziert außerdem die Eigenständigkeitsrolle gegenüber den USA. Mit der EU im Rücken war das britische NATO-Mandat stärker.
.
FÜNF: Zukunftsentwicklungen ökonomischer und kultureller Qualität versprechen auch für Großbritannien weitere Expansion als EU-Vollmitglied, und geringere weltweite Durchdringung als EU-Ausland.
.
SECHS: Inzwischen haben nicht nur die LABOUR-Wähler und damit auch die LABOUR-Party einen Anti-BREXIT-Kurs angeschlagen. Nun hat der TORIES-Kongress 2017 ebenfalls erhebliche Anti-EXIT-Kräfte hervorgebracht – weil nämlich auch große Wähleranteile der TORIES gegen den EU-Austritt stehen.
.
Hier kam es jetzt zu dem lustigen Beschwörungsauftritt von MAYs Sekundanten BORIS JOHNSON, der als britischer EU-Funktionär in Brüssel stets gegen EU gegiftet und intregiert hatte, der jetzt in Manchester ausdrücklich als MAYS BREXIT-Unterstützer sich so klar aussprach, dass die Töne zwischen den Zeilen bereits mitschwangen.
.
SIEBEN: BREXIT erscheint immer mehr als eine Stimmung von nationalistischen Scheuklappen-Politikern, wie FARAGE von UKIP, sowie von rückständigen Teilen von den KONSERVATIVES und von LABOUR.
.
.
theguardian.uk.com am 2. Oktober 2017:
.
„Business leaders give lukewarm response to Hammond’s speech“
.
Die wichtige (sozialliberale) Londoner Tageszeitung THE GUARDIAN berichtet – unten wird zusammenfassend übersetzt:
.
„Chancellor announces no new policies and uses Tory conference speech to attack Corbyn and Labour’s economic record Business groups have given a lukewarm reception to Philip Hammond’s main speech to the Conservative party conference in which he announced no new policies and spent much of the address attacking Jeremy Corbyn.
.
In a speech with an unusually strong focus on the opposition, the chancellor called the Labour leader “a clear and present danger” to prosperity and likened his economic policies to those in Cuba, Zimbabwe and Venezuela.
.
Referring repeatedly to Labour’s record in the late 1970s, he singled out Corbyn and his shadow chancellor, John McDonnell, as “dinosaurs”, saying the party’s conference last week showed they would “wreak havoc” on the UK.
.
“It’s a wicked and cynical business offering superficially simple solutions to complex challenges,” Hammond said in his speech in Manchester that contained relatively few positive offerings from his party beyond a general commitment to market economics.
.
There were no new announcements, though the chancellor did confirm Pfund 300m in new investment for railways in northern England and Pfund 10bn extra for the government’s help-to-buy housing scheme.
.
Business groups welcomed Hammond’s affirmation of free markets, but said they had hoped for more substance. Carolyn Fairbairn, the CBI’s director general, said the address showed “a government strong on diagnosis, but weak on action”.
.
She added: “The UK is facing a generation-defining challenge. A potent cocktail of Brexit uncertainty and dogma-driven politics on both left and right threatens jobs, investment and living standards. Now is not the time for half-measures.”
.
Stephen Martin, the head of the Institute of Directors, said Hammond had been right to praise the market-based economy. “Actions speak louder than words, however, and he must back up his support for business in the upcoming budget,” he said.
.
“There was nothing of real substance on infrastructure, on tackling the housing crisis, the funding shortfall in our NHS and care system, and nothing at all for hardworking families who are struggling to keep up with rising prices.”
.
Amid wider government worries that they are in danger of losing the public battle over the economy to Labour, Hammond strengthened his attack further at a fringe meeting later on Monday. He argued that big businesses should be duty-bound to oppose what he called Labour’s “existential challenge to our economic model”.
.
“It has to be responded to by all those who believe in the market, and all those who live by the market. It cannot be left to one political party to make the case for the market economy,” Hammond said at a CBI-sponsored event.
.
“We do not expect big business, PLC business, to engage in party political debate, we do not expect PLCs to support political parties. But I do expect them to support the case for the market, and I do not expect business to pull its punches in making the case for the market economy.”
.
A long section of Hammond’s main speech was devoted to what he called a “history lesson” into the Labour record before Margaret Thatcher took power in 1979. The chancellor began: “Now I can almost hear the warning bells going off in conference control centre: ‘Don’t talk about the 70s!’
.
Recounting the then Labour government’s recourse to the IMF, amid rising inflation and high tax rates, Hammond said Corbyn and McDonnell wanted to lead the UK back to that era. “A new generation is being tempted down a dangerous path,” he told the arena. “We have to explain why and how the market economy works and the role of competition as the consumer’s friend.
.
“I think we owe it to the next generation to show how Corbyn’s Marxist policies will inevitably lead us back to where Britain was in the late 1970s.”
.
Hammond compared Labour’s policies with those used in Cuba, Zimbabwe and Venezuela, calling the latter a country “tragically impoverished” by policies supported by Corbyn.
.
Hammond said of Corbyn: “He is a clear and present danger to our prosperity, damaging our economy. Even in opposition his loose talk already deterring the entrepreneurs and the investors we need for our future success.”
.
He did acknowledge that the Conservatives needed to listen to the “fears and concerns” of voters over areas such as living standards, and “the frustration among the young who fear that the combination of student debt and sky-high rents and house prices will condemn them never to access the opportunities of property ownership their parents enjoyed”.
.
.
‚Tories lie consistently‘: students on Theresa May’s tuition fee plans
.
Theresa May tackled the topic of tuition fees at the Conservative party conference in Manchester. In an attempt to woo younger voters, she said low-earning graduates would benefit from a delay in their student loan repayments. She also vowed to freeze fee levels.
.
Der Hauptredner der TORIES in Manchester hat insbesondere die LABOUR-Linie aufgespiest, die den „PLEITE-Weltuntergang Englands“ unter THERESA MAYS BREXIT-Linie an die Wand malen: CUBA lässt grüßen (Philip Hammond’s main speech to the Conservative party …). Hammond redet von Marxismus der Labour, von Corbyn, der von Studentenarmut und Angst ausgeht.
.
We asked students whether the prime minister’s change of tack had won them over. Here’s what they had to say:
.
Ruby Dalziel, 20, from Nottingham: It’s just an attempt to win votes and I won’t be swayed: The Conservative party are keen to attract young voters because, after the last election, it was clear that we were drawn to Labour. So Theresa May is considering making the bracket [for earnings when you have to start paying your loan back] Pfund 25,000 as opposede to Pfund 21,000. This is of no interest to me whatsoever because the Tories lie and have done consistently. There is no reason for me to trust them. It’s an attempt to win votes and I won’t be swayed – Jeremy Corbyn all the way! There are many things the Tories could improve on – it’s not just about student life and I won’t be a student forever. Community is important to me, it’s not natural to have capitalist values and I don’t want to live in a world that is like that.
.
Carmen Kirkby, 20, from Plymouth: The Conservatives could not do anything that would make me vote for them: Student fees are way too expensive. I get frustrated because I am paying so much money but don’t always get much back, especially when you do an arts degree. Fees are so high and if you compare it to countries where university is free, it should be the case here. Education should be accessible. The Conservaties could not do anything that would change my mind and make me vote for them. They are a horrible party for breeding fake values.
.
Ashaana Bheir, from London: Jeremy Corbyn sounds like he is more for us I don’t think you should have to pay for education and £9,000 [for tuition fees] is so much. If the Conservatives did something to make it cheaper then that would be good but there are some places in the world where it is free. I voted for Jeremy Corbyn at the last election because he sounds like he is more for us, and more for people really. Theresa May doesn’t seem to care. If she wants to change people’s opinions she should be more like Corbyn and make everything more suited for upcoming generations.
.
Kayley Castle, 18, at Manchester University: I don’t agree with getting rid of fees completely: They say they will cap tuition fees but politicians have said stuff like that before and they’ve still gone up. I don’t believe anything is going to change. I don’t agree with getting rid of tuition fees completely because people on minimum wage would have to pay for people to go to top universities and then earn really good salaries. I do agree that they should be reduced in some way though. I support Labour at the moment. I don’t agree with the fundamental principles of the Tory government, so I don’t think I would ever support them.
.
James Vickery, 20, from Surrey: If she pulls it out the bag, then I would be really happy: Theresa May has more work to do to win over young voters. Corbyn gave us much more reason to see him as a good leader. She has now realised the error she made and is going back on herself, but she has more to do in my mind. It’s a step in the right direction but it is one thing to make a promise and another to follow it through and execute it. We will see, but if she pulls it out of the bag then I would be really happy – everyone would be.
Liam Kipling, 21, at Manchester University: I would only vote Tory if Corbyn was in charge: The new announcement doesn’t really make much difference. The only thing the Tories could do that would make me vote for them is to put Corbyn in charge. He’s the only one that’s different. I don’t think tuition fees are a massive problem for people my age but it’s not nice being in so much debt. My debt will be £80,000 by the time I leave, plus inflation. It wouldn’t have stopped me going to university
.
Ellie Ward-Thompson, 22, from Yorkshire: It does make the Conservatives a more attractive option: This is purely a response to how Jeremy Corbyn campaigned. He definitely got the vote of the younger generation by trying to tackle student debt. But I also don’t think his plans were very realistic. What he proposed could not have happened without the country being in serious debt … Theresa May has a similar pipe dream but her plan is more realistic and in the right direction … She has had some interesting ideas about pensions too but I am not sure it’s necessarily the answer. It does make the Conservatives a more attractive option as it’s much more level-headed. Labour tends to jump on things all guns blazing without taking into consideration the figures.
.
Ash Camyab, 18, from London: Labour is actually trying to make a genuine difference: The new tuition fee announcements are not enough to tempt me to vote Tory. I’ve come to a decent university: I’m hoping to get a good job so I can pay my loan back anyway and Labour is trying to abolish tuition fees altogether. I know a lot of people who have just finished university and it is impossible to get housing. I want to live in London – it’s where I’m from – and it’s impossible to live in a nice area of London near to your work. The Tory government isn’t actually helping students, they just want to be able to say that they are. Labour is actually trying to make a genuine difference.
.
Ellie Harman-Taylor, 20, from Portsmouth: Who has been raising the fees in the first place?: It’s classic Tories. They are seeing Labour win over young voters and they think “we can do that too” but they are not going to. Who has been raising the fees in the first place? I had my loan cut by £2,000 this year and it’s not OK. Until real big things are done to change it I don’t care what they have to say.
.
.
Dietmar Moews meint: Die Meinungen der im GUARDIAN wiedergegebenen Studenten klingen nicht kopflos. Es darf entspannt abgewartet werden, wie sich die Briten geistig-sozial und sozial-psychologisch läutern, indem sie nunmehr eine EU-Mitgliedschaft durchdeklinieren bzw. einen BREXIT seriös abzuschätzen versuchen.
.
Entspannt zuwarten, nicht aus Schadensfreude, sondern weil es die britische Selbstbestimmung ist und weil wir, weder als Deutsche noch als EUler steuern können.
.
Liest man die Stellungnahmen der Studenten im GUARDIAN, wird schon deutlich, dass die BREXIT-Volksabstimmung nicht wirklich alle Briten erreicht hatte. Aber besonders, dass die jüngeren Mitbürger nicht allein ökonomisch, sondern emotional als EUROPÄER die Europäische Gemeinschaft gerne fortsetzen würden.
.
.
FINE E COMPATTO
.
WARNUNG: recommended posts (Zusätze, die als Empfehlungen oder Beziehungen von WordPress hier eingestellt werden)
auf dem Dietmar Moews‘ Blog eingeblendete „Recommended Posts“ oder sonstige „Pseudoempfehlungen“ werden von WordPress
.
gegen das Einverständnis des Eigentümers Dr. Dietmar Moews
.
hier gezeigt und sind keine Empfehlungen von Dr. Dietmar Moews. Nichts davon wird i.S.d.P. von Dr. Dietmar Moews verantwortet. Dietmar Moews klickt diese „recommendends“ nicht an und liest nichts davon.
.
Ab jetzt werden alle Dietmar Moews‘ Blog-Beiträge mit dem SLOGAN
FINE E COMPATTO deutlich beendet.
.
WARNUNG: recommended posts
.
und BESTELLEN
subscription to Dietmar Moews Abonnement von Dietmar Moews un abonnement à Dietmar Moews
Blätter für Kunst und Kultur erscheinen in loser Folge im Verlag Pandora-Kunst-Projekt Köln
Blätter Neue Sinnlichkeit
.
.
Indem ich Ihnen ein langes Leben wünsche, sparen Sie auf diese Weise ganz erheblich.
Abonnement auf Lebenszeit für EURO 500,- (oder entsprechender Landeswährung)
Einzelpreis oder Abonnement inkl. Versand EURO 12.-, Schüler bei Selbstabholung EURO 4.-
Abonnieren Sie mit Namen, Postanschrift, Ort, Datum, Unterschrift sowie EURO 500 zur Verrechnung bei:
PANDORA KUNST PROJEKT
zu Händen Dr. Dietmar Moews
Mainzer Straße 28
D-50678 Köln am Rhein
Dietmar Moews's Blog 